Fresh small print about the controversy surrounding Meghan Markle’s diamond earrings have been published in an explosive new book.
Royal body of workers were too scared to confront Meghan Markle and Prince Harry over diamond rings gifted by using the Saudi Crown Prince, it is claimed.
The Duchess of Sussex wore the “blood-soaked” jewellery to a state dinner in Fiji in October 2018 – three weeks after the homicide of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, which a US justice record observed was approved through Mohammed bin Salman.
However media were in the beginning informed that Meghan’s glitzy chandelier rings had been “borrowed” from a jeweller.



But it transpired they have been a wedding present from the Prince, who, at the time of wearing, used to be implicated in the Khashoggi killing.
The journalist was once murdered and dismembered inner the Saudi embassy in Istanbul, Turkey, on October 2, earlier than his physique components had been disposed of.
A new e book claims that on seeing photographs of the Duchess wearing the Butani diamonds in Fiji, London-based personnel responsible for registering the small print of all royal gifts regarded them.
But after alerting Kensington Palace, a decision was made not to increase the difficulty with the Sussexes.
Writing in Courtiers: The Hidden Power Behind The Crown, Valentine Low fees a supply saying: “We made a choice no longer to confront Meghan and Harry on it, out of worry for what their reaction would be.”



The following month, the former Suits actress wore the jewelry again – to the then-Prince Charles’ 70th birthday birthday party at Buckingham Palace.
An aide then allegedly took the count up with Harry, who is stated to have regarded “shocked” that humans knew the place the jewels had come from.
Lawyers for the couple deny he was ever questioned.

Read more: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's daughter Lilibet had the cutest reaction to her dad's dancing.

Speaking on behalf of Meghan, regulation company Schillings said: “At no stage did the Duchess inform staff that the jewelry have been ‘borrowed from a jeweller’, as this would have been untrue and consequently any suggestion that she encouraged them to lie to the media is baseless.”
And two days later, a spokesman added: “It is feasible she stated the rings were borrowed, which is correct, as offers from heads of country to the royal family are gifts to Her Majesty the Queen, who can then choose to lend them out to members of the family.”



Lawyers additionally argued that Meghan did no longer understand about Salman’s suspected involvement in Khashoggi’s murder.
The Sun has contacted representatives for the Sussexes for comment.
Around the identical time, Meghan used to be accused of bullying palace staff – driving two non-public assistants out of the family and undermining the self belief of a third.
A senior aide allegedly raised concerns about her “difficult demands” to which they stated she snapped: “It’s now not my job to coddle people.”

Tags: Queen, Prince Charles, Camilla, Prince Louis, Prince William and Kate Middleton, Prince Charles, Prince Harry, Meghan, Lilibet


Make positive you in no way leave out a ROYAL story! Sign up to our e-newsletter to get all of our celebrity, royal and life-style information delivered at once to your inbox.